A conversation yesterday with one of the
lovely girls I coach for debating got me thinking. She was telling me how she
flatly refused to follow a teacher’s instructions, and in return received a ‘behavioural
strike’. What even is that? I wish I could say that in my day, had I done
something like that I would have received a detention, but the truth is, in my
day (bearing in mind it is only a few years since I graduated), the most I
probably would have gotten was a talk from my year level coordinator – maybe the
head of senior years, with very little punitive consequence other than my own
conditioned self-guilt.
The alarming trend toward children is that they are allowed to run free without teaching them any serious understanding of consequence
or discipline. As a result of my work, I see this in classrooms and
one-on-one behaviour.
In a classroom, there are often
only one or two students who act up, but I have very little authority to
discipline students. However even the hands of regular teachers are frequently
tied. A stern talking-to will only ever be so much of a deterrent, and the
behaviour will inevitably start up again. The problem is that if a teacher
comes down to hard on a student, there is a risk that the parents of that
student will come back to the school, in defense of their child, which then
lands the teacher in trouble for being "too mean" to a student who was
misbehaving in the first place.
In one-on-one tutoring situations, I have
had to teach seven year olds who I am unable to discipline because the parent is in
the adjacent room and will reprimand me for attempting to rein in their unruly
child. There are of course, techniques that can be used to make the child sit
still, but it is difficult to reason with a small child.
The issue then becomes that because the
child is not concentrating, or finds the work required in order to improve
boring, no progress is made, and one must then justify this to the parent.
In both of those instances – both classroom
and individual, I point the finger at political correctness and a indignation
on the part of parents that stems from the message that nobody should tell you
how to raise your child. It is impossible to tell a parent the truth about
their child, because they don’t want to hear it. When you want to say “Your
child is an undisciplined little brat who is at times, quite rude”, you have to
instead say “Your child could learn motivational skills, and it would be beneficial
if they would develop a more positive attitude towards learning, and the
learning environment”. It doesn’t really pack quite the same punch, and
moreover, it leaves room for interpretation as to the meaning.
The unwillingness of parents to hear
anything negative about their children means that their children aren’t
instilled with the self-discipline to be dedicated students, or often, even
particularly polite.
Maybe I’m just a crotchety old woman before
my time, I have witnessed parents threatening their young children with
punishments if they don’t start behaving immediately, and then when the
behaviour continues look at me apologetically and shrug, suggesting we end our
lesson short.The only thing this tells the child is that they can get away with this sort of behaviour.
I think that in some ways this has led
employers saying that they are least willing to hire generation Y workers,
because they are the least disciplined or fastidious when it comes to their
work. Gen Y (my generation) is the generation that grew up with the beginnings
of this behaviour. I dread to imagine what this will be like for the students
in school now. So I would just like to say a big thank you to my mother for
smacking me when I was being unruly or rude (in honesty, she sometimes still
does). Mother, I understand why you did it, and I think it’s the best thing you
could have possibly done for me.
Thanks for sharing your perspective Alice.
ReplyDelete